Search for: "Merrill Lynch Corporation" Results 461 - 480 of 773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2009, 11:44 am by Vanessa Vidal, Esq.
A number that BofA would use to threaten a pull-out from its Merrill Lynch merger, which eventually earned the bank another $20 billion in federal bailout funds. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:21 am
This article first appeared in Corporate Counsel, a US sister title of Legal Week. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
It wasn't performance-related, says corporate spokesman Robert Stickler, and it wasn't related "to any advice he was giving on the Merrill Lynch merger. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:09 am
Testing the Scope of BofA's Privilege Waiver The American Lawyer A group of plaintiffs lawyers is testing whether Bank of America's waiver of attorney-client privilege in the Merrill Lynch flap might apply to shareholder suits against BofA related to its merger with Merrill. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
So the advisor acts much as the management of any business corporation, while the board acts much as do boards of such corporations. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:33 pm
The acumen of the business executive, the competitive environment in the industry, and the recruitment and retention challenges faced by the hiring corporation all bear heavily on an appropriate level of compensation. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm
’” [24] The sale of the Chicago Cubs would bring the Tribune creditors approximately $740 million. [25]The largest of these creditors includes JPMorgan, Chase Bank NA, Major League Baseball, and Merril Lynch Capital Corporation. [26]. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Merrill Lynch Asset Management. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 2:46 am
legalweek Amid the piles and piles of formerly privileged documents related to the Bank of America-Merrill Lynch merger, there are a few notes and emails from mid-December 2008 showing that Bank of America's lawyers at Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz were saying very different things to their client and to federal regulators, according to this story from Corporate Counsel. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 2:46 am
Amid the piles and piles of formerly privileged documents related to the Bank of America-Merrill Lynch merger, there are a few notes and emails from mid-December 2008 showing that Bank of America's lawyers at Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz were saying very different things to their client and to federal regulators, according to this story from Corporate Counsel. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm by Vanessa Vidal, Esq.
Eric Roth, a litigation partner at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, apparently was telling the Bank of America Corp. leadership one story about how difficult it would be to escape from the merger with Merrill Lynch & Co. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 9:39 pm
The executives at Merrill Lynch have suggested that BoA knew of the losses before it consummated the merger. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:13 am
Last week the Delaware Court of Chancery heard arguments in the litigation involving the Bank of America and Merrill Lynch merger. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:42 am
Documents in Bank of America Probe Apparently Show CEO Misled Federal Officials Corporate Counsel New documents in the Bank of America Corp. investigation show that chief executive Ken Lewis apparently misled federal officials when he asked them to cough up $20 billion and other financial incentives to keep him from canceling the bank's merger with Merrill Lynch & Co. [read post]