Search for: "Michael B. Smith" Results 461 - 480 of 851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
" The 112 count indictment unsealed in Cayuga County Supreme Court today charges 21 people with crimes including various Criminal Sale and Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance (class A,B,C,D felonies) and Conspiracy in the second degree (class B felony). [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:26 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Graham M. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from Erica Goldberg at In a Crowded Theater and Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm by Bridget Crawford
Johnson Eric_E_Johnson North Dakota Jackie Jones jackiejones27 UWE Bristol Jeffrey Kahn KahnTax Florida State Anil Kalhan kalhan Drexel Daniel Martin Katz computational Michigan State Ariel Katz relkatz Toronto Jeff Kirchmeier JLKirchmeier CUNY Renee Knake reneeknake Michigan State Mike Koehler fcpaprofessor Southern Illinois Lynne Kohm LynneMarieKohm Regent Eugene Kontorovich EVKontorovich Northwestern Russell Korobkin russellkorobkin UCLA Kim Krawiec KimKrawiec Duke Susan Landrum SusanLandrum1… [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:51 am by Eugene Volokh
Partlett (Emory), Jonathan Peters (Georgia), Michael Perry (Emory), Glenn Harlan Reynolds (Tennessee), Ani B. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:07 am by Shea Denning
New G.S. 7A-5(b) raises the mandatory retirement age for a justice or judge of the appellate division to 76. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:25 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Rawls College of Business Administration; and Tom Smith, director of special projects in the Texas Public Citizen’s office. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 1:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Having resisted so well to the inventive step attacks and held its ground against the arguments on undue burden to produce anything within the claims, it was ultimately felled by Deputy Judge Michael Tappin QC in Saint-Gobain v 3M [2022] EWHC 1018 back in May because there was no dependent claim with a narrower range to save the independent claim whose range was too broad. [read post]