Search for: "Michael Ginsburg" Results 461 - 480 of 775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2018, 1:20 pm by Sandy Levinson
 But it is also open to the pervasive game of "whataboutism," as with Justice Ginsburg's openness about her appalled opposition to Donald Trump as a possible president. [read post]
10 May 2022, 7:26 pm
As far as Chinese law is concerned, Mary Gallagher, Hualing Fu & Michael Dowdle, and Taisu Zhang & Tom Ginsburg have investigated the role of law for China’s Party-state, among others. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 4:11 am by SHG
Retribution was a bad thing only a few days ago, when Trump malevolently used the word to describe the killing of Michael Reinoeh in Portland. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:18 am by Lyle Denniston
  Former federal judge and now law professor Michael W. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Additional commentary on NIFLA comes in op-eds from Thomas Glessner at National Review, Michael Farris at Fox News and Kentucky Today, Maggie Amos for USA Today, and Kristin Waggoner for The Washington Times. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
Roxanne Roberts and Amy Argetsinger of the Washington Post report on “a surprise hit at the Supreme Court gift shop”:  the cookbook created by spouses of the Justices as a tribute to Marty Ginsburg, the late husband of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:34 am by Steve Hall
" Michael Landauer posts, "Hank Skinner decision a step toward truth-seeking," at the Dallas Morning News. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Collins
In a foreword, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg adds her own perspective to that portrait, describing the friend she admired despite their jurisprudential differences. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm by cdw
Ginsburg wrote a concurring opinion in the case. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 3:18 pm by Amy Howe
Two justices – Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor – indicated that they would have denied the state’s request. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:47 am
Michael Jakes, a Washington lawyer arguing for a patent on that invention, faced a seemingly unending litany of hypotheticals to test how far he would take his plea for wide access to a patent monopoly. [read post]