Search for: "Michigan v. Thomas"
Results 461 - 480
of 993
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 8:55 am
S. ___, ___ (2015) (THOMAS, J., concurring); Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:35 am
Area School Dist. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Thomas (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, March 9, 2018 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Hedge funds, In re Revlon, In re Trulia, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Unocal v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
Her separate opinion tries to clarify some of the confusion from Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
Thomas also wrote the defendant-favoring opinion construing the Speedy Trial Act in Bloate v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 3:08 pm
Knick v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am
Reporting and commentary on the import of last month’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:15 pm
“All applicants must be treated equally under the law, and no benefit in the eye of the beholder can justify racial discrimination,” Thomas wrote in Fisher v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:16 am
DeCiccio (which held that the Second Amendment protects dirks and police batons), as well as between this decision and the Michigan Court of Appeals’ decision in State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Justice Thomas with opinion in Parker Drilling v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
At the Michigan View, Jeffrey Hadden previews next week’s oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:45 am
In the 2009 Term, the Court heard just two cases, Michigan v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:40 am
In Michigan, it was illegal to “cure” ballots. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Answer: Yes, According to the United States Supreme Court in Watters, Commissioner v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
Levine, Goldman v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:06 am
Thomas M. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:56 am
As gay, lesbian, and other proponents of same-sex marriages celebrate the United States Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
