Search for: "Miner v Miner"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2020, 5:06 am
The question in Cannisnia Plantation, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:57 am
Furthermore, looking to the factors considered in Indigo Minerals, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:57 am
Furthermore, looking to the factors considered in Indigo Minerals, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
., LLC et al v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
The SJC cited a United States Supreme Court case involving a state statute extinguishing mineral rights when not exercised for 20 years, Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:08 am
WTX Fund, LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 2:53 pm
Zinke (Mineral Leasing)Fercho v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Skye Mineral Investors, LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Frase, Richard S. and Julian V. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 9:07 am
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 1515 The case concerned whether Zipvit, a trader selling vitamins and minerals by mail order, is entitled when accounting for VAT on its sales to make deductions of input VAT (the tax paid by the trader on goods and services purchased in connection with its business, as opposed to output VAT, which is the tax charged to the consumer by the trader on its goods or services) in respect of the price of postal services supplied to it by Royal Mail. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
If you have any questions concerning the Briggs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
If you have any questions concerning the Briggs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:21 am
Here we continue our discussion of the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:01 am
Emmerich, and Sabastian V. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:02 am
In Skye Mineral Investors, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:04 am
The question for the Texas Supreme Court in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
This Fried Frank memo reviews Skye Mineral Investors, LLC v. [read post]
