Search for: "Murphy v. Murphy" Results 461 - 480 of 3,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
The leading cases on the nature and extent of the constitutional right to freedom of expression at Irish law are Irish Times v Ireland [1998] 1 IR 359, [1998] 2 ILRM 161 (2 April 1998) (doc | pdf) and Murphy v Independent Radio and Television Commission [1999] 1 IR 12, [1998] 2 ILRM 360 (28 May 1998) (doc | pdf) (which I have considered here); but the insights in these cases have not been applied to or in the defamation context.… [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:53 pm by Ilya Somin
In this field, she tended to vote in favor of very broad federal power even in some cases where other liberal justices went the other way, as in Murphy v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:00 am by Peter Ling
If this story sound familiar to Kat readers, it is because similar facts were featured in a landmark CJEU decision of 2011, C-429/08 "Premier League v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 9:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Murphy, followed by an explanation of McGirt and its holding. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 1:02 pm by Josh Blackman
Rosengrant (Rosengrant2), 612-617 Financial Real Estate Transactions, 617-622 Notes, Questions, and Problem, 622 Texas home equity fixed note (skim) Texas mortgage deed of trust (skim) Foreclosures: Murphy v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 7:36 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Murphy (University of Melbourne, School of Law) has posted Police Doorknocking in Comparative and Constitutional Perspective: Roy v O’Neill (Sydney Law Review, Volume 42(3), 2020) on SSRN. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Murphy of the Scranton, Pennsylvania office of Bardsley, Benedict & Cholden, LLP, for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 5:00 am by Christopher Tyner
Judge Murphy concurred in part and in the judgment but dissented from the majority’s discussion of two unpublished cases and also would have sanctioned the State for certain misleading comments included in its brief. [read post]