Search for: "Nicholls v. Nicholls"
Results 461 - 480
of 857
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2013, 12:44 pm
In its February 14, 2013 decision in Melody M. v Robert M., the Third Department affirmed an order of now-retired St. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
Trust v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:18 am
This principle was explained most notably by Judge Learned Hand in the 1930 case Nichols v Universal Pictures: It is of course essential to any protection of literary property, whether at common-law or under the statute, that the right cannot be limited literally to the text, else a plagiarist would escape by immaterial variations. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
Kuddus v Chief Constable ([2002] 2 AC 122), the highly respected senior Law Lord, Lord Nicholls said “From time to time cases do arise where awards of compensatory damages are perceived as inadequate to achieve a just result between the parties. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:41 pm
Nichols v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:59 am
In Lyon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm
Sir Robin Jacob (who retired from the Court of Appeal last year but was making one of his occasional reappearances) in giving the leading judgment noted Lord Nicholls in Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] AC 284, p.308: “The court may grant an injunction against a party properly before it where this is required to avoid injustice […] The court habitually grants injunctions in respect of certain types of conduct. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:17 am
Nichols, 569 S.W.2d 412, 420 (Tenn. 1978). [read post]
College Football Predictions for FBS Week 3 2012 by SportPundit and the Yards Per Play System YPPSYS
10 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
Team A (visitor) v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
That is one of the issues that Madam Justice Fitzpatrick was asked to decide in Tassone v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:10 am
Apple v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am
Calilfornia Cal by 11.5 California 31-27 California 28-17 Nicholls State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In Arnstein v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
Nichols: 15 paragraphs, opens with sparse background on parties. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
When there is a time bar, then, as Lord Nicholls observed in Valentines Properties Limited v Huntco Corporation Limited [2001] UKPC 14, at [20] “Inherent in a time limit is the notion that the parties are drawing a line. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 3:19 pm
In the case Helen Ward v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:14 pm
Might I suggest you take a look at Nichols on Eminent Domain (Matthew/Bender). [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
In Salinier v. [read post]
