Search for: "No Respondents Named" Results 461 - 480 of 30,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2010, 2:22 am by gmlevine
The Respondent moved timely in federal court under the ACPA to block transfer of the domain names. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Jamison Koehler
Responding to the controversy over the name of the pro football team in the nation’s capitol, the Onion announced that the team has decided to change its name. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:04 pm by Jim Walker
Yesterday the Sun Princess cruise ship responded to a disabled sailing yacht in the middle of the Tasman Sea. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:17 am by gmlevine
It is fundamental that a respondent’s intent at the time it registers a disputed domain name to take advantage of the complainant’s reputation in the marketplace is an essential element of bad faith. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:33 am by gmlevine
For example, Respondent Purple Bucquet has a perfect record of losing 11 proceedings, for the most part involving one domain name as with , although it has also registered domain names with the dominant element of the trademark (< autosaol.com>, and ). [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Joinder as a necessary party requires that an individual be clearly named as a necessary party by name in the caption of the petition and served with a copy of the notice of petition and petition to inform the individual that he or she should respond to the petition and enter a defense.In this appeal the Commissioner found that the record indicated that the appellant [Petitioner] did not personally serve a necessary party [Respondent]. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Joinder as a necessary party requires that an individual be clearly named as a necessary party by name in the caption of the petition and served with a copy of the notice of petition and petition to inform the individual that he or she should respond to the petition and enter a defense.In this appeal the Commissioner found that the record indicated that the appellant [Petitioner] did not personally serve a necessary party [Respondent]. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Joinder as a necessary party requires that an individual be clearly named as a necessary party by name in the caption of the petition and served with a copy of the notice of petition and petition to inform the individual that he or she should respond to the petition and enter a defense.In this appeal the Commissioner found that the record indicated that the appellant [Petitioner] did not personally serve a necessary party [Respondent]. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
Respondent is Georges Elias, who registered the disputed 111 domain names with GoDaddy.com. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
  Please take a moment to complete the NACBA SurveyLog in with the same user name and password that you use on the NACBA website. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:48 pm by Michael Lowe
” Injustice to Some Individuals Named on Texas Sex Offenders Registry The reality is that having your name on the Texas Sex Offenders Registry means that you may have problems finding a job, or holding on to that job. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:15 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Internet Archive Blogs – Kate Tairyan, MD, MPH  – “The University of Washington’s (UW) Seattle campus is about 5 miles as the vector flies from Kirkland’s “Life Care Center,” the now ironically named the first epicenter of North America’s COVID-19 epidemic. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:15 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Internet Archive Blogs – Kate Tairyan, MD, MPH  – “The University of Washington’s (UW) Seattle campus is about 5 miles as the vector flies from Kirkland’s “Life Care Center,” the now ironically named the first epicenter of North America’s COVID-19 epidemic. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
In response, the Hunts filed a supplemental and amending petition to add the city as an additional defendant on July 26, 2013, but the city responded with an exception of prescription. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
In order to win a UDRP arbitration, the complainant must show that the respondent both registered and used the domain name in bad faith. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:21 am by gmlevine
Beneficial owners can remain anonymous, in which event the respondent’s right or legitimate interest will be tested against the proxy’s (fictitious) registration and use of the disputed domain name. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:54 am by Simon Fodden
Originally begun in March, the suit names 30 international law firms and one LPO as respondents. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:20 am by gmlevine
The Panel explains that While the Respondent has used the names of two members of the Mittal family in the Domain Names, it appears to the Panel that the primary target was probably the company ArcelorMittal. [read post]