Search for: "PEREZ v. STATE"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:03 pm
The obstruction enhancement was at issue in the Fourth Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:53 pm
This post was authored by Sebastian Perez, JD, Jacob D. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 5:12 pm
Learn what’s happening across the United States and how you can get involved with our panel featuring EFF Staff Technologist Daly Barnett, EFF Associate Director of Legislative Activism Hayley Tsukayama, EFF Staff Attorney Jennifer Pinsof, and Adri Perez. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 6:51 am
The religious organization won in the district court, but loses in the Court of Appeals, finding the notice requirement is not compelled speech in violation of the First Amendment.The case is CompassCare v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:02 pm
App’x at 642 (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
Arch Bay Holdings v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:36 am
This ruling reverses the district court's contrary finding on summary judgment.The case is Mercedes v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:52 am
Garre argued five cases before the Supreme Court last term: for the respondent in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:15 am
Perez, issued on July 20. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:59 am
The Supreme Court has ruled that a federal student disability statute does not require aggrieved students to administratively exhaust their claims before filing suit in federal court, but only in certain circumstances unique to this case.The case is Perez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 8:29 pm
This post was authored by Sebastian Perez, J.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:13 am
(C.D.Cal.2009) 258 F.R.D. 361, 373-374 [wage statements failed to include hours worked and applicable hourly rate]; Perez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:17 am
Abbott v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:59 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In applying the OML, the courts construe its provisions liberally in accordance with its stated purposes (see Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; Gordon v Village of Monticello, 87 NY2d 124, 127 [1995]; Encore Coll. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
United States and Perez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:08 pm
Perez v. [read post]
