Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 461 - 480 of 4,544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 4:42 am by SHG
After learning of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court held in Florida v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
(This is distinct from civil rights cases, where the plaintiff's lawyer recovers fees as a matter of course if plaintiff wins the case).The case is Padula v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:03 am
" The idea is that the standard of review used by a court to review a districting plan would depend on whether the process that created that plan was appropriately democratic. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
However, it did not evaluate formaldehyde safety in cosmetic products intended to be aerosolized – which is precisely what occurs during the application of the hair straightening or smoothing product. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
However, it did not evaluate formaldehyde safety in cosmetic products intended to be aerosolized – which is precisely what occurs during the application of the hair straightening or smoothing product. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:50 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
In an ACLU case currently pending before the Supreme Court, Arizona v. the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, ACLU clients are challenging the State of Arizona's attempt to impose additional barriers to voter registration beyond the requirements of the standardized federal voter registration form. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
Lastly, the government criticizes the Fourth Circuit’s use of campaign statements as “impermissible under any legal standard. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 8:55 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Some civil cases use the preponderance of evidence standard. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm by Jay Stanley
Specifically, he asked why, even though experts agree that the recent Supreme Court case US v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Thus, unlike in Bose, the decision before us does not involve the ultimate determination of whether the speech was libelous and therefore unprotected. [read post]