Search for: "PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION" Results 461 - 480 of 1,186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2017, 8:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
With the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Google Inc. v. [read post]
This post provides an overview of shareholder proposals submitted to public companies during the 2022 proxy season,[1] including statistics and notable decisions from the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on no-action requests.[2] I. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
Champions Real Estate Services Inc (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)   [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 11:42 am by Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
A company’s survival ultimately depends on the public’s use of their product or services, and thus retaining a good reputation is vital. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
So it's all about the "new public" ! [read post]
More recently, the Supreme Court considered the general rules governing the implication of terms into contracts, in the case of Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor [2015] UKSC 72  (Case Comment here). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm by Gregory Schick
The Final Rules add a new section (v) to Item 402 of Regulation S-K that require certain public reporting companies to describe the relationship between the executive compensation actually paid by the company to its NEOs and the financial performance of the company over a specified time horizon and to disclose each of the following in a prescribed tabular format. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
The independent public accountant must be registered with, and subject to regular inspection as of the commencement of the professional engagement period, and as of each calendar year-end, by, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in accordance with its rules. 7. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Access THE QB-Lu research paper on CFC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
Tech companies are in a unique position to know about surveillance requests that are kept secret from the press and the public. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:48 pm by Chuck Cosson
  In addition to direct costs of compliance imposed on service providers, other costs of regulation are borne by the public at large. [read post]