Search for: "Paine v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 6,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2007, 5:46 am
In so holding, the Court stated that it was comporting with the original legislative intent of the "no-fault" law, which was "to eliminate recovery in a common-law tort action for minor personal injuries" (Zecca v Riccardelli, 293 AD2d 31, 33). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
Coakley) and the extent of state power to regulate abortion by uses of drugs rather than surgery (Cline v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 7:23 am
NO-FAULT - INSURER'S RIGHT TO EUO - COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL - ARBITRATED CLAIMS Brentwood Pain & Rehabilitation Servs., P.C. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Referring to Balbuena v IDR Realty LLC, 6 NY3d 338, the Appellate Division opined that "conflict preemption" occurs "when compliance with both federal and state law is a physical impossibility, or where the state law at issue ... stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:20 pm by John Hochfelder
Naturally, there are outliers and very severe ankle fracture cases can result in sustainable pain and suffering verdicts of $1,000,000 or more, for example, in: Conway v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]