Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2015, 5:42 am
Property owners should monitor these efforts as well as similar initiatives by federal and state agencies. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:37 am
The title of this post comes from this paper by Professor Mary Ziegler, the abstract of which states: In granting cert in Young v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 12:30 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Judge William H. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 11:10 am
At the heart of their decision is the determination of whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act adopted in 1978 requires employers to treat pregnant workers like every other employee or like other workers with restrictions, such as temporary injuries.(1) The case involves Peggy Young who sued her former employer, United Parcel Services (UPS), under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act for refusing to make accommodations for her condition despite medical recommendations. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:20 am
United Parcel Service, Pregnancy Discrimination, and Reproductive Liberty. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:36 am
United States Parcel... [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
United Parcel Service, Pregnancy Discrimination, and Reproductive Liberty. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
United States Whitfield v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
United States, the Facebook threats case, continues. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a Pennsylvania man can be held criminally liable for his statements on Facebook. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
United Parcel Service, in its October 2014 term, a case that hinges on this very paradox within the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:43 am
The United States, No. 14-622C (Sept. 29, 2014), involved a DeCA solicitation for the supply of fresh pork products. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:06 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:33 am
On December 3rd, the Court will hear argument in Young v. [read post]
