Search for: "Parente v. State Board of Equalization" Results 461 - 480 of 596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2010, 8:44 am by Eric Schweibenz
On December 21, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Spansion, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
(k,n,m) corresponding to the (mNK+nK+k)’th time period, k being equal to 5, the method comprising calculating the R(m) component of the coning compensation according to the formulas n taking on integer values from 1 to H, H being equal to 3, U(h,k) and V(h,k) being predetermined numbers for all values of h and k, W(h) being a predetermined number for each value of h, and the symbol x denoting the vector cross-product operation.The Board first states… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:06 am by GuestPost
Following an unsuccessful internal appeal to the School’s board and a failed appeal from that to the Department of Education and Skills under section 29 of the Education Act 1998, the Irish Traveller Movement Independent Law Centre filed proceedings on behalf of Mary and her son in the Equality Tribunal in July 2010. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am by Mary A. Fischer
Board of Education On Monday, December 6, San Francisco police are bracing for record crowds to jam the streets surrounding the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am by Adam Chandler
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Gail Markels and George Rose contend that California’s law restricting the sale of such games to minors is, at a practical level, unnecessary because it “empower[s] state bureaucrats to do what parents and retailers are already doing at no cost to taxpayers. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am by Law Lady
SCHOOL BOARD OF ALACHUA COUNTY, Appellee. 1st District.Gear Shift: LOUISIANA APPEALS COURT AFFIRMS $5 MILLION VERDICT IN CHILD-DEATH CASE, Guillot v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Elie Mystal
She never argued that, because legacy preferences are hereditary, they presented a “suspect” classification that should be judged by the “strict scrutiny” standard under the amendment’s equal-protection clause.The district-court judge in the case, Rosenstock v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:18 am by James Bickford
” At the Blog of Legal Times, Tony Mauro reports on an amicus brief filed by nine states and Puerto Rico in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Many parents are clueless when it comes to computers and what is out there. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:09 pm by Gideon
” West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943) But really, Judge Walker didn’t need to write that long decision. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
It is probably the broadest injunction in the entire body of United States law, because it is designed to stop the "race of diligence" among creditors, and to protect the debtor and the bankruptcy estate, in Arizona and the rest of the country. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:43 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  About the Author Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, management attorney and consultant Ms. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:11 am by Anna Su
Board of Education is one of the most important and well-known Supreme Court cases for two reasons. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm by Carter Ruml
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm by Carter Ruml
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]