Search for: "Paris v. Feder" Results 461 - 480 of 702
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
Or perhaps the legal reporters who usually write about these sorts of things had been reassigned to cover Paris Hilton's lock-up. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:10 pm
You can read Joe Cohen's piece on Gimex v The Chillbag Company here. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:20 am
The Court notes, moreover, as pointed out by the Federal Court of Justice, that the photos of the applicants in the middle of a street in St. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:57 am by Douglas
Na saída do plenário, representantes de associações de magistrados afirmaram que vão analisar se questionarão a constitucionalidade da norma no Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:57 am by Douglas
Na saída do plenário, representantes de associações de magistrados afirmaram que vão analisar se questionarão a constitucionalidade da norma no Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
This brief journey down memory lane just goes to show that over the past two *cough* years, everything changes, but everything stays the same be it in music or in IP law.Lawyer Barbie back in the Federal Circuit dealing with Bratz - Something else that has not changed all that much from last year is the continuation of the Barbie v Bratz battle (previously reported by the AmeriKat here) which last week heard the parties' opening arguments in Californian federal court… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Schafer, Matthew and Valsangikar, Tanvi, The Application of the New York Anti-SLAPP Scheme in Federal Court (2023). [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Take the example of carriage taxes at issue in the 1796 Supreme Court case of Hylton v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
More generally, as the Warren Court made the protections of the Bill of Rights more extensive and elaborate, it made a lot of sense not to operate with separate sets of rules for federal and state governments, particularly in the area of law enforcement. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
(Ron Coleman’s Likelihood of Confusion) ONEL – Pieter Veeze’s 2010 Markenforum speech (Class 46) France Cour d’appel Paris: French law implementing London Protocol procedural so to be enforced immediately with retroactive effect: Unilever v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Canada Canadian Advertising and Marketing Law has covered the federal anti-spam legislation, highlighting common compliance errors. [read post]