Search for: "Paul Hughes"
Results 461 - 480
of 830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2012, 12:12 am
” The first witness in Tuesday’s morning hearing was Simon Hughes MP, who said the police initially gave him limited information over the hacking of his phone by private investigator Glenn Mulcaire. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Paul Goldstein has a recent short paper: it should be what the author says it is. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Paul Gibbons (@foimanUK) explained the campaign here. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
News of the deaths of Sunday Times reporter Marie Colvin and French photographer Remi Ochlik and the serious injuries of photographer Paul Conroy and Edith Bouvier, a freelance journalist reporting for Le Figaro, from a mortar shell that hit the building in Homs, Syria that they were using as makeshift media centre has saddened and shocked reporters and readers. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
News of the deaths of Sunday Times reporter Marie Colvin and French photographer Remi Ochlik and the serious injuries of photographer Paul Conroy and Edith Bouvier, a freelance journalist reporting for Le Figaro, from a mortar shell that hit the building in Homs, Syria that they were using as makeshift media centre has saddened and shocked reporters and readers. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:20 pm
News of the deaths of Sunday Times reporter Marie Colvin and French photographer Remi Ochlik and the serious injuries of photographer Paul Conroy and Edith Bouvier, a freelance journalist reporting for Le Figaro, from a mortar shell that hit the building in Homs, Syria that they were using as makeshift media centre has saddened and shocked reporters and readers. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
But although, this kind of approach did not survive Von Hannover in the courts, it is still one which is favoured, entirely unsurprisingly, by certain newspaper editors, in particular Paul Dacre, who argued in his Hugh Cudlipp Memorial Lecture, 2007, that popular papers “need to be sensational, irreverent, gossipy, interested in celebrities and human relationships and, above all, brilliantly entertaining sugar coated pills if they are to attract huge circulations and devote… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Dacre v Grant Despite Steve Coogan’s claim that “This is not, in case the press try to portray it that way, the Steve and Hugh show”, the dispute between Hugh Grant and Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre bookended module one. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm
See law professor Paul L. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
In 2007, Hughes-Jehan approached my colleagues and I, then running the Southern African Legal Information Institute, to host the English language version of JurisPedia. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:17 am
’ Paul A. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:15 am
Paul Foreman 42. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
She separately reported on Paul Dacre’s appearance here. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
The last witness to appear before the chairman was Daily Mail editor in chief Paul Dacre whose dispute with actor Hugh Grant dominated the proceedings. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:41 am
During an appearance before the Leveson inquiry, Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre still insisted that actor Hugh Grant was not truthful during his own testimony before the inquiry, calling the actor's words "a mendacious smear. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 6:20 am
Paul Dacre, notoriously shy editor-in-chief of the Daily Mail, made no secret of his dislike of the Leveson Inquiry witness box when he was called to give evidence not once but twice this week. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm
I interview Mark Steyn and Congressman Ryan today, and will ask them both about the stunning and deeply repulsive anti-Catholic bigotry that mark's today's New Yorker essay by staff writer John Cassidy. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm
” Antony White QC Opinion: “Defamation and False Privacy” – Hugh Tomlinson QC Is following people illegal? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:47 am
Merrill, Charles Evans Hughes Professor of Law, Columbia University Randall C. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Sharpe considers that section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 “was used completely inappropriately to prosecute [Paul] Chambers“. [read post]
