Search for: "People v Brown" Results 461 - 480 of 3,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
A more restrained decision from the Court could have produced a less divisive regime that provided greater legal protections for people claimed as fugitive slaves. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am by Eric Goldman
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The article exposes how the federal government played a role in extending racial segregation and discrimination by funding segregated schools up to 10 years after the Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by SHG
Applying Mathews v Eldrige’s deprivation of rights analysis, Judge Brown considered the likelihood of erroneous deprivation. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
While defendant complied, Folkerte could see that defendant was attempting to hide a brown wooden cigar box within the backpack. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:35 pm
It's true that it's hard to hire people when you only hire people who are currently employed at jobs that make $X a year -- and often have living and mortgage obligations accordingly -- when your offer is to pay them $X/2. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
" It was long, long after the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:20 pm
News organizations lauded the decision as being in the same echelon as other historically important SCOTUS decisions, such as Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:37 am by SHG
 It came after the United States Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix.
If she chooses to deport people to states where torture is endemic, those people must be able to challenge that decision in an impartial tribunal. [read post]