Search for: "People v Coffee" Results 461 - 480 of 645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  It’s what called sample selection bias:  people draw conclusions from a non-representative sample of data. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:38 am by R. David Donoghue
In that case, Solo was accused of falsely marking coffee cup lids sold to Starbucks. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 6:24 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
  The Sheika case recounts the three major opinions I know of on the subject: People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
Denomination of origin granted for Machu Picchu Coffee – Huadquina (IP tango) Poland Courts note differences between wine and vodka (Class 46) Russia More fashion apparel companies seeking to register trademark in Russia (Russian Patents Blog) Switzerland The new Swiss patent litigation system (EPLAW) United Kingdom PCC Page 23: IPOff’s tentacles get some cross-examination? [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:17 am by SHG
  It's just that, well, he didn't know.In a New York Times article about Kentucky v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:14 am by charonqc
But now… it is time for coffee, Marlboros and a read of the tabloids and the broadsheets at a cafe… a piu tarde. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:10 pm
Some of the signs that the dog could exhibit to demonstrate viciousness would be growling at people, snarling at people, or just showing its teeth in an aggressive manner in the presence of people. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2) (DeBund)… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They raise the price, eliminate competition, cut people out, transfer consumer surplus to themselves—but they are also giving something to people who canafford the chair: a chair with more narrative and thus more market value. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:38 pm by George
Two people so handicapped do not, in fact, cancel each other out. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:27 pm by Bexis
  Id. at *5-6 (citing Weedon v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]