Search for: "People v Irish"
Results 461 - 480
of 594
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2011, 4:03 pm
The decision in Sinnott illustrates that in Irish law, no less that in England (Theakston v MGN [2002] EWHC 137 (QB) (14 February 2002); Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457, [2004] UKHL 22 (6 May 2004)) and under the European Convention on Human Rights (Peck v UK 44647/98, (2003) 36 EHRR 719, [2003] ECHR 44 (28 January 2003); von Hannover v Germany 59320/00, (2005) 40 EHRR 1, [2004] ECHR 294 (24 June 2004)), it is no longer an answer (if it ever was) simply to… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 am
Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
(See, Fajujonu v Minister for Justice [1990] 2 IR 151). [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am
The point was considered in the seminal decision of Eady J in McKennitt v Ash [2006] EMLR 10. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:40 am
” Texas v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:43 am
But, as pointed out in the Irish Times, the ruling may in fact make things fairer all round. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
However, in what would be called obiter remarks if the ECtHR has such a thing, the Court noted that “Unlike Romani gypsies, who are widely recognised as an ethnic group, and Irish Travellers, who are a traditionally nomadic people with their own culture and language, New Travellers live a nomadic lifestyle through personal choice and not on account of being born into any ethnic or cultural group”. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
Despite this ruling the UK government has not yet amended the offending provisions of s.3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
In the UK we are represented by the British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII), set up in 2000 with the enormous help of the pioneering Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
I have written before, with Cliona Kelly, of the failure of the Irish legislative processes to internalise the Convention in an effective manner. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
Related PostsDecember 23, 2010 -- Irish abortion law’s ‘waters about to break’? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
The Cearta.ie blog has a post about the impact of MGN v United Kingdom on Irish cases before the Court of Human Rights. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
v=zDZFcDGpL4U&feature=player_embedded3. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:05 am
We are pleased to welcome the latest in our series of reponses to the judgment in A, B & C v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
Related PostsJanuary 10, 2011 -- Irish Women Politicians and Abortion: Hope for change after the ECHR ruling (0)December 15, 2010 -- In advance of A, B & C v Ireland: A Primer on the ECtHR (0) [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:59 pm
Vice President Joe Biden: "More people are going to be put to work this summer. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 12:31 pm
But because Ireland’s law is based “on the profound moral views of the Irish people as to the nature of life,” the court said, Ireland was entitled to an extra “margin of appreciation. [read post]
