Search for: "People v Jacobs" Results 461 - 480 of 697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Speakers included prominent members of the judiciary, such as Lord Hoffmann and Lord Justice Jacob from the UK and the Hon. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
The starting-point for this little essay is a dictum of Lord Justice Jacob (noted by the IPKat here) in European Central Bank v DSS [2008] EWCA Civ 192 to this effect: "[This litigation] illustrates yet again the need for a one-stop patent shop (with a ground floor department for first instance and a first floor department for second instance) for those who have Europe-wide businesses. [read post]
19 May 2012, 7:53 am by Paul Jacobson
However, in exercising these rights, people should at all times be conscious that they are not absolute. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:32 am by Jeff Gamso
  She did or did not murder her 4-year-old son, Jacob. [read post]
29 May 2022, 9:20 am by Keith Mallinson
There are now more cellular connections than there are people on the planet. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am by Rishabh Bhandari, Jordan Brunner
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan argued that China will not fix North Korea, offering four other areas of focus instead. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
Censorship exists for the good of the people! [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am by ngarnett
   For more on this argument, see this interesting article on city v. suburban fortunes in the current recession. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
In the words of Jacob L.J. in Schlumberger: "They did not say: "this is our problem. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
  The case was People v. [read post]