Search for: "People v Jesus"
Results 461 - 480
of 497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2007, 5:04 am
You can read his blog here (which reprints the most amusing hate mail from immature Jesus-freak cops). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:46 pm
On July 3rd the ILB posted an entry that began: "The 7th Circuit heard oral arguments in the case of Hindrichs v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 1:34 pm
In 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall, in the case Marbury v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 3:09 pm
Jerry & Pat Traditional Family Values Putting the "Problem" in Perspective Hypocrites PART V WHAT TO DO? [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 9:12 pm
Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
There, accepting a challenge by a "Jesus freak" to take the Book of Isaiah seriously, he saw that the messiah must be Jesus and became one of the "Jew for Jesus. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:28 am
He discusses a few cases from last Term: the school integration case, "Bong Hits 4 Jesus," the campaign finance case, etc. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
NASA couldn't build a Saturn V today. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 9:26 am
Frederick (the "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case) I have had occasion to do a little thinking about originalism. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 10:01 am
Jesus. 4. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 9:40 am
, the one in which Matt Fraser was punished for giving a student government speech laced with sexual double entendres (calling people "douchbags" is arguably worse); and (2) San Diego v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:16 am
The context is Morse v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 12:45 am
" Zorach v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:11 am
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 7:05 am
Supreme Court's analysis in Morse v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:00 am
Fish writes that people are confusing education and democracy. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 12:44 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court handed down the "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS" case, Morse v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:33 am
Fredricks (Bong Hits 4 Jesus)- 5-4 (6-3?) [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
Highler v. [read post]
