Search for: "People v Legall"
Results 461 - 480
of 31,237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2023, 10:04 am
I've attempted in vain to think of a legal issue more depressing than the one squarely presented by the competing opinions in this case, which solely involves the following issue:Was the evidence here sufficient to support an inference that the defendant intended to kill his 13 week old baby when he tortured him? [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 2:31 pm
So, even though he is legally less culpable without a finding of premeditation, he faces more minimum time in custody. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
They were both sentenced to LWOP.A series of legal challenges followed. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
It's tough to translate aphorisms into modern day legal advice. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Wow.Then there's the resulting legal quandry:"The experts all agreed that since Oceja was already unconscious when the sex crimes occurred, they did not materially contribute to her death. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 pm
You can get a job in a non-legal field.Or you can simply pretend that you're an attorney.That's what Edward Starski did here. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:31 am
The Court of Appeal's starkly worded opinion holds, unanimously, that pursuant to the plain language of Proposition 64 (which legalized marijuana), it's no longer a felony to possess this product in prison. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:00 pm
Though, still, the events predate the most recent legalization moves. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:26 pm
Appellant's counsel takes that academic argument and turns it into a concrete legal one.But the Court of Appeal says that you can lead an appellate tribunal to water, but you can't make it drink. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:12 pm
Findlaw has just posted a column I wrote on Alvarez v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:19 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
Over at Defending People, blogger and criminal defense lawyer Mark Bennett has been carrying on a discussion with his readers about legal ethics. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:35 am
Sweeney & Cohn. supra, at p. 835 citing People v Edney, 39 NY2d 620 (1976); Cornell v Bernstein-Macaulay.Inc., 407 F.Supp. 420 (SDNY 1976); Heam v Rhay, 68 FRD 574 (ED Wash 1975); see also Deutsche Bank Trust Co. of Americas v Tri-Links Inv. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:06 pm
Today the Rhode Island Supreme Court announced its 3-2 decision in Chambers v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:58 pm
Friedrich v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
You just sometimes get people who go totally off track when confronted with legal issues and half a sense of what they entail, and that -- when combined with intelligence (to a degree) and a fair amount of intellectual hubris and narcissism -- results in people like Weber. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
The issue of discrimination against LGBT people is again making legal headlines as a federal appeals court in Atlanta recently ruled that Title VII does not include within it a protection for workers who suffer discrimination based upon their sexual orientation. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:17 pm
There are some unusual aspects of legal ethics that lay people may not understand. [read post]
