Search for: "People v Legall" Results 461 - 480 of 34,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2018, 10:31 am by Andrew Hamm
Under his theory, “where decision-making by courts is concerned, precedent is the best guide to constrained discretion of judges, to hold the legal system stable, to let people order their affairs. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:51 am by Myers Freelance
The post Competitive Keyword Ads Go to Court: Edible Arrangements v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
Over at Defending People, blogger and criminal defense lawyer Mark Bennett has been carrying on a discussion with his readers about legal ethics. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:26 am by structuredsettlements
John Darer and Mark Wahlstrom covered the Hartford Life withdrawal on The Legal Broadcast Network on October 28, 2009 [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 pm
 You can get a job in a non-legal field.Or you can simply pretend that you're an attorney.That's what Edward Starski did here. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 2:31 pm
So, even though he is legally less culpable without a finding of premeditation, he faces more minimum time in custody. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:31 am
  The Court of Appeal's starkly worded opinion holds, unanimously, that pursuant to the plain language of Proposition 64 (which legalized marijuana), it's no longer a felony to possess this product in prison. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:26 pm
  Appellant's counsel takes that academic argument and turns it into a concrete legal one.But the Court of Appeal says that you can lead an appellate tribunal to water, but you can't make it drink. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
If I did have the discretion, this is something that I would strongly consider doing for you, but I don’t believe that I have the legal ability to do it. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
It's tough to translate aphorisms into modern day legal advice. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:04 am
I've attempted in vain to think of a legal issue more depressing than the one squarely presented by the competing opinions in this case, which solely involves the following issue:Was the evidence here sufficient to support an inference that the defendant intended to kill his 13 week old baby when he tortured him? [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
 Wow.Then there's the resulting legal quandry:"The experts all agreed that since Oceja was already unconscious when the sex crimes occurred, they did not materially contribute to her death. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
 They were both sentenced to LWOP.A series of legal challenges followed. [read post]