Search for: "People v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT"
Results 461 - 480
of 622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
The Fifth Circuit held that the search was unconstitutional but that the good faith exception applied. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:43 am
The Court returned to that topic Wednesday morning when it heard arguments in Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
In the fine Fifth Circuit tradition, Sepulvado v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
People exist stacked atop each other. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
” The district court also looked to an earlier Supreme Court decision, Romer v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
As the Court held in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Hollingsworth, the 9thCircuit dissolved its stay of the District Court’s injunction against Proposition 8. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Unilever US, Inc., decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 9. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:39 am
I'm writing this from the Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the High Court ruled that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, and thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the High Court ruled that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, and thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
The trial court, which is to say the United States District Court in Manhattan agreed with Ms. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
In determining whether grand jury evidence is legally sufficient, the court must determine whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People, if unexplained and uncontradicted, would be sufficient to warrant conviction by a trial jury. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:13 pm
Rumpole practice tip #19: Be aware of Wilson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gillespie v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:33 pm
Holder with Fisher v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
As federal district Judge John D. [read post]
