Search for: "People v. District Court of State" Results 461 - 480 of 14,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Page 567 658 N.Y.S.2d 567 172 Misc.2d 186 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:44 am by Daniel Schwartz
For some time now, however, the plaintiffs have made some oral arguments at various proceedings that the United States District Court Judge Janet Arterton should recuse herself from the case. [read post]
Whether the prohibition on unfair and deceptive practices in WCPA protects against price gouging is a question of first impression that originally came before Judge Lasnik in the United States District Court in the Western District of Washington. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the district court held, and the Second Circuit agrees, that the plaintiffs are not prevailing parties based on a Supreme Court ruling, Sole v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:17 pm
The Court of Appeal affirms the trial court's recusal of the entire District Attorney's office in San Luis Obispo from prosecuting some Black Lives Matter protesters, holding that the extrajudicial comments of the District Attorney might suggest that he might not prosecute the matter in a neutral fashion given his demonstrated antipathy to the BLM movement. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court decides 5-4 that the federal courts have no oversight into how state legislatures apportion congressional districts. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:24 pm by WIMS
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court [In Los Angeles Cnty. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:53 pm by Peter Vickery
Dechert asked the federal district court to send the question to the highest state court, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC). [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm by Cindy Cohn
The American people and our Constitution deserve more from federal courts. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:04 am
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 10:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The panel held that the district court did not err by declining to make findings regarding the Treaty’s meaning to the Yakama people at the time of its signing because the meaning to the Yakama people could not overcome the clear words of the Treaty. [read post]