Search for: "People v. Farmer"
Results 461 - 480
of 782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2013, 6:23 am
Q: Cariou v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:38 am
in Prose Wks. (1890) V. 173 Mr. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:05 am
Indeed you might well think his last name were Malletier, just as people have last names such as Baker, Carpenter and Farmer, except that those names go quite a ways back to well before surnames got nailed down in Europe. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 3:08 pm
Well, "works" for everyone except the people in Kern County who have to live near it. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
(see Roberts v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:42 pm
She then went on to discuss how NIF helped a farmer, patent and commercialize a frugal technology developed by him. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:06 am
As a follow up to my tongue-in-cheek post last Friday about language from judicial opinions I want to mention something that's bothered me for a while now, and see if people think I'm being over-sensitive: the jocular riffing on Justice Holmes's "Three generations of imbeciles is enough" language from Buck v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:14 pm
Bowman v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am
The Act provides immunities and defenses for legitimate “patients” and “caregivers”, but pecuniary schemes like the one at issue in this casenote are clearly not protected by the MMMA.Compassionate Apothecary, a medical marijuana dispensary, or “provisioning center”, was the business model that underwent recent scrutiny by the Michigan Supreme Court in People v McQueen. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:03 am
In a significant decision further deepening Michigan's medical marijuana jurisprudence, the Michigan Court of Appeals, in the case of People v Tony Green, held that non-compensated marijuana transfers from one registered medical marijuana patient to another are immune from prosecution under section 4 of the Medical Marijuana Act (MMMA).This case is significant for two reasons. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm
A holiday for most regular people. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
The Policy, further, states that the focus is on “both people for science and science for people”. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm
Yet this concern would seem to support training for DIY urban farmers, just as subsistence farmers have always had to learn proper animal husbandry skills. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 6:49 pm
The case, People v Bylsma, arose out of Kent County and is distinctive because it is the first case under the Act that involves a collective grow operation.Ryan Bylsma was a certified care provider under the MMMA. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 4:16 am
In Big Sky Colony et al. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 12:57 pm
Here is the basic model: The Smith family are farmers. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 12:41 pm
Farmer v. [read post]
