Search for: "People v. Gay" Results 461 - 480 of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2009, 10:38 am
  Ironically, this is a school board that has found itself on the wrong side of civil rights history before, in the famous case of Arline v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
Failure I: Judiciary as a Counter-majoritarian InstitutionIn Koushal, the Court could barely conceal its disdain when it described lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgendered people as ‘a miniscule fraction of the country’s population’ [43] with ‘so-called rights’ [52]. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:19 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
  Bishop Harry Jackson (a pastor in Maryland), retaliated with a law suit (Jackson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm by Chris Hampton, LGBT Project
And some stories we've been hearing from some of the plaintiffs in Donaldson and Guggenheim v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
Larry O'Dell, Associated Press Writer, Richmond, Va. wrote about a recent Virginia Court of Appeals ruling, Stroud v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:49 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Was Conklin v University of British Columbia, [2021] B.C.J. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 11:18 am by NARF
Illinois Gaming Board (Illinois Gambling Act; Mootness) Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am by Matthew Pinsker
Vermont was also the first state to allow civil unions for gay couples in 1999. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
v=eqefgERZQXs Merlin and Queen Morgan's skills do not lie in their ability to prepare magic potions or control people, but in their capacity to make, unmake, use, interpret and reinterpret symbols – the sword that made Arthur become a King, the ritual which gave birth to Lancelot. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by David Cruz
  Given at least Justice Ginsburg’s seemingly sincere concerns about deciding more than she needs to, this makes the Loving-for-gay-people outcome unnecessary and unlikely. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:51 am by SHG
The Supreme Court breached the “sanctity” of the jury room in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The only reason to oppose this bill is as a back-door means of criminalizing youthful gay relations, since after Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]