Search for: "People v. George" Results 461 - 480 of 2,926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm by Helen Alvare
Helen Alvare is a Professor of Law at George Mason University School of Law. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:09 am by Connie Crosby
Some people in certain demographics are more comfortable with this than others. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:43 am by John Jascob
To date, about half of the whistleblowers have been company insiders, and the other half are investors, people at competitors, people who do data analysis, or people with a personal relationship with the wrongdoer, he said.Last year there was an increase in cases where companies interfered with the whistleblower, according to Ceresney. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:37 pm by David M. Boertje
The February 2023 case (Sharpe v Winterville Police Department) involved a motorist who was stopped by police. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
Will John Roberts really want to make Bush v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:28 pm
NOW AVAILABLE: Spring/Summer 2017 NewsletterThe latest issue of the California Supreme Court Historical Society’s Newsletter is now available on the Society’s website: www.cschs.org.The lead article is an extraordinary in-depth account of the infamous case People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
 The Democrats blame Trump,  Russia , China, Ayn Rand, Trump, Twitter, Global Warming, George Bush, The federalist Society and Justice Gorsuch. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Center at George Washington University Law School (YouTube). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Lawsuits Against Defective Products", the Court heard arguments on February 25 in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in  Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]