Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 461 - 480
of 15,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 1:25 pm
On September 24, 2018, the trial court granted appellant 36 months’ formal probation on the condition that he serve one year in county jail with credit for time served. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 11:31 am
National Council of Nonprofits et al v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:59 pm
As you know, it has long been held that counsel fails to preserve for appellate review legal insufficiency claims when he has failed to raise the issue in a specific TOD motion (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]). [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:46 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:57 am
The grant of a privacy injunction in the case of AMC v News Group Newspapers ([2015] EWHC 2361 (QB)) has unleashed a deluge of largely inaccurate media comment worthy of the “super injunction spring” of 2011. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:42 am
First, in People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:48 am
But the Court of Appeal, in an opinion by Justice Yegan, grants a writ and reverses.I understand and appreciate both sides of the dispute. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:50 pm
Even if it may well not be around all that long: given the significant sea change in California sentencing that it presages, I wouldn't be surprised if the California Supreme Court grants review -- or, perhaps more likely, depublishes the opinion (a distinct possibility given that Justice McAdams ends up affirming the sentence below on the ground that this particular defendant admitted the prior juvenile offense).Moreover, the timing was interesting: I doubt that Justice McAdams… [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:06 pm
v=sNyj4FV56JY [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Jack Gilbert, Lead Litigation Counsel for Facebook, explained that Facebook generally takes a neutral position on applications to identify people behind pages or profiles on their network. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:49 pm
The Supreme Court also granted certiorari in Mohamed v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 10:19 am
The first grant, a consolidation of Barr v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:02 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
Thus, primarily because of the "legal stigma" attached to warrantless and suspicionless stops, the People bear the burden of proving at a suppression hearing that the particular checkpoint in question was conducted in a non-discretionary manner, that is, the officers did not exercise individual discretion as to which cars to stop or what questions to ask akin to People v Cabrera. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 12:00 am
Several people have wondered whether the change in presidential administrations may alter the federal government's position supporting the State of Hawaii in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:10 am
In Trinity Assembly of God of Baltimore City, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 4:08 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:26 pm
Justice Marilyn Kelly would grant leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
Barr v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 11:24 am
Ancestry Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]
