Search for: "People v. Jacobs"
Results 461 - 480
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
If, on the other hand, one distinguishes between the morality (and hence the appropriate legality) of different abortions, based on when in pregnancy they take place or why they take place, then an absolute opposition to wrongful birth suits becomes harder to defend.In the case that first established a cause of action for wrongful birth in Texas, Jacobs v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
Surrounded by very intelligent people, I have always learned something I needed to know. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 am
Just for kicks, here’s a piece from Justice Lewis Powell’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:57 am
And as Jacob Sullum makes manifest in other examples of innocent people held for having the wrong name, this is hardly just a David Sosa problem. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 7:51 am
Decisions this Week United StatesSwart v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 11:15 am
In Antonelli v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
The ICO concluded that there is always meaningful human involvement in the decision-making process but recommended that local authorities identify risks to people’s privacy, maintain transparency and ensure GDPR compliance. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 12, 2008 Jacobs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
Jacob Ware dropped from the docket after he was declared incompetent to stand trial on account of delusions and paranoia, and Joshua Clough pleaded guilty to a weapons charge at the end of 2011. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
The functionality or ideas that lie behind the code is protected (SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 at §20-§37). [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 6:11 am
That broad consensus is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
See Wright v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
It’s about time people realised just how arrogant and exploitative the Magic Circle firms really are. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Thus far, only five people have not had comments published for this reason. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Powell v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm
Jacob J. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
The Gupta case is U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
This includes coverage of the law school's recent seminar, chaired by Sir Robin Jacob, on the controversial ECJ rulings in FA Premier League v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
