Search for: "People v. Kelly"
Results 461 - 480
of 851
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2012, 11:05 am
Cortez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:16 am
by: Kelly A. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm
KAM Transport, Inc and in People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
There are people who may be making a profit from the sale of “medical” marijuana. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 2:51 pm
The film's voice cast features famous actors including Kelly Macdonald, Julie Walters, Billy Connolly and Emma Thompson. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:49 am
The “common-sense purpose” of the Kelly rule requires that it be applied whenever a party is trying to introduce scientific techniques that, though “new, novel, or experimental, convey a misleading aura of certainty.” People v Stoll (1989) 49 C3d 1136, 1156. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In Arakelian v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:32 pm
Kelly. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:21 am
In 2006, the Florida Legislature enacted several statutes in response to the United States Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:42 am
Justice Mary Beth Kelly wrote for the Court. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm
As the Court of Appeals so eloquently stated in Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass’n v Detroit, 218 Mich App 263, 270; 553, NW2d 679 (1996): The wisdom of the principle of judicial restraint expressed by our Supreme Court in [Attorney General v Ingham Circuit Judge, 347 Mich 579; 81 NW2d 349 (1957)], is self-evident; the notion that our courts may precipitously intervene in the political arena and preempt a vote of the people is inconsistent with both… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:03 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:37 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:36 am
In three cases consolidated under the lead case of People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:47 pm
In a lead opinion authored by Justice Mary Beth Kelly, and joined by Chief Justice Young and Justice Zahra, the Michigan Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:58 am
Consider The People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Kelly said, "It's one thing when people sell their blood for money; it's another when they sell their drugs, especially when the diversion compromises the pharmaceutical supply with tainted and outdated drugs. [read post]
