Search for: "People v. Kent" Results 461 - 480 of 627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
In March 2004 Kent County Council, Re B (A Child) v the Mother & Ors [2004] EWHC 411 (Fam), Sir James Munby set out the classic exposition of the court’s ability to relax or restrain publication via the inherent jurisdiction. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog has an article on recent findings of an evidence review on young people’s digital literacy, online resilience and wellbeing, conducted as part of research for the ySKILLS project. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
Ohio, 17-7233, both were convicted of killing people in botched robberies. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:03 pm by Tessa Shepperson
’ In fact the human rights defence approach to possession proceedings has started in the wake Manchester v Pinnock with the case of Mr Alan Clark, a tenant of West Kent Housing Association, again mentioned in Inside Housing who argued that evicting him for anti social behaviour was a breach of his human rights because the landlord had other methods of curbing his behaviour available as an alternative to possession, for instance issuing an injunction against him. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 12:27 pm by Bill Otis
 It's also noteworthy that both parties' Supreme Court selections were (and are) very likely to support the Court's most recent holding, in Glossip v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 12:41 pm by familoo
It was implemented as a result of the decision of Sir James Munby (as he then was) in Kent CC v B (RE B (A CHILD) (DISCLOSURE) [2004] EWHC 411 (Fam) [2004] 2 FLR 142) to render lawful that which Munby had said was a regular but inadvertent contempt precluded by s12 Administration of Justice Act 1960: disclosure between professionals in furtherance of child protection. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
[viii] What about the courtroom deputy (CRD) who was assaulted by Judge Kent? [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The Samaritans said “it was felt the column’s use of imagery and tone violated the dignity of people who had died by suicide and intruded into the grief of their families“. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am by INFORRM
  A similar point is made about the Osler case by blogger “Jack of Kent. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
On Friday 21 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Iqbal v Geo TV Limited. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]