Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 461 - 480
of 729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am
In just the last few months, for example, opionions include People by James v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am
Last June in a 5-4 ruling in Carpenter v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
(para 173) The Judge added that whilst the primary obligation in Article 3 was a negative one, the Court had recognised a positive obligation to protect individuals from ill-treatment and that an obligation may arise even when there is no ill-treatment from the state or from other people. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm
For instance, he might set a criminal free for a reason which has nothing to do with the reliability of the evidence or the justice of the case.Orin Kerr at VC has this post on United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
But it is not the issue before this court Comment “But they haven’t done an equality impact assessment” is a fairly common complaint, although even that can be of less use to a challenge than people think; see, for instance, R(Brown) v SSWP [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin) and R(Meany) v Harlow DC [2009] EWHC 559 (Admin). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
The case, Utah v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am
Lord Kerr would have dismissed the appeal. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 9:39 am
David NosalFacebook v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:41 pm
Dep’t of Prob., 115 F.3d 1068, 1074–75 (2d Cir.1997); Kerr v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am
Listed for two days from this morning in Courtroom 2 is the appeal of Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, to be heard by L Hale, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Hughes and L Toulson. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:20 am
But for providers that aim for data localization — putting the data in the country or region of its users — domestic law enforcement can generally use warrants to get the emails of people in the United States but need to use mutual legal assistance to get emails of those abroad. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr (massively paraphrased): but has Parliament has not given citizens of the UK rights by way of the 1972 Act, and therefore would have to be consulted in order for them to be taken away? [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:06 pm
The conclusion reached in the case of Ligue Contre Le Racisme v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 10:45 am
Riley v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am
” This conclusion was reaffirmed by the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am
But the opening of Judge Korman’s opinion in Abidor v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too intensively and for too… [read post]
