Search for: "People v. Marshall" Results 461 - 480 of 1,948
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm by Katie Barlow
The modern version of the committee confirmation process, with senators pressing nominees on their judicial views, started in 1955 when southern Dixiecrats wanted to grill John Marshall Harlan about his view of the court’s decision the previous year striking down school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
   We explained in Red Families v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 2:59 am by familoo
We know this because the reason the review was commissioned was that people have been making the same serious complaints for years. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
Saturday: This Week's Ten Most Popular TaxProf Blog Posts Law Schools In Chicago And Cleveland Consider Removing Chief Justice John Marshall From Their Names Bar Exam Update Tax Consequences On The Sale Of Encumbered Property: Recourse v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
And when the people speak, the Court listens. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 11:14 am by Pamela S. Karlan
” Back in 1964, likely no one in Congress thought lesbian, gay, or bisexual people should be protected. [read post]