Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 461 - 480
of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Holding that because we know that the Legislature didn't want people shooting at cars, this legislative history "breaks the tie" and means -- as in virtually every case -- that the rule of lenity is meaningless.Of course, the Legislature probably didn't want people shooting at an occupied vehicle from inside a vehicle as well -- since that may well have the same consequences (death, broken glass, car crashes, etc.) as shooting from… [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
State v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:23 am
Which lots of people would find trivial.Plaintiffs contend that 7-11's payroll system shorts its workers. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:07 am
Sacramento police close 16th at V Street for hit-and-run investigation Updated: 6:07 AM PDT May 31, 2024 WE BEGIN WITH BREAKING NEWS. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:15 am
One of the themes of the opponents of the law is that it's a bad idea to allow the government to stop people without suspicion to demand: "Papers, please. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
On 17 May 2019 Julian Knowles J heard an appeal in the case of Desporte v Bull. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:33 am
Certainly that proposition is not supported by the only two cases the People cite. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:01 pm
I know that some of our youngest readers are starting to study for the bar exam this week.Maybe this will help.It's a good review of the elements of solicitation and attempt; in particular, as applied to attempted murder. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:26 am
In Miller v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:57 am
Filed under: Attorney/Lawyer, Criminal Law, Evidence Tagged: forfeiture of constitutional right, Michigan Court of Appeals, People v Vaughn [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
The court in People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:54 am
In Ezell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 8:22 am
” Case citation: People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
Debonneville v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 3:43 am
The conference in Warner v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:39 am
It's pretty obvious that the statute is directed at people who convince minors to make kiddie porn, right? [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:35 am
When you've got lots of cases involving searches that turn up guns, you may have a keener sense that virtually everyone has a gun (or that most people searched have a gun) than actually exists.I don't know how much this plays into things, but I'd be surprised if there wasn't some tendency along these lines. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:33 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
