Search for: "People v. More"
Results 461 - 480
of 48,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
" Or, more accurately, "However distorted my personal view of precedent, at least I'm not this big of a nutjob. [read post]
Admitting DNA Evidence was Harmless Error in Murder Case – People v. Williams, 2020 NY Slip Op 02123
1 Apr 2020, 2:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 9:08 am
Hat tip to Simple Justice who had this nice post on the recent decision in People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 7:46 am
"More on Bowles v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm
" People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
Sheldon Roberts v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 7:55 am
People v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:22 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Remember that Hood himself later said he would have a conflict of interest in going after people who had been commissioned to do selected work for the AG's office, like Joey Langston and Tim Balducci, and that it would be like going after family. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am
Their bodies retain more sugar than is necessary to survive. [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:05 pm
A theory that sounds even more attractive when you've been smoking a ton of weed when you come up with the plan.But one of the many deficiencies of the plan -- and by no means the biggest, I might add -- is that one of the guns you bring with you to the scam might accidentally go off and shoot someone. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 1:28 pm
Ultimately the California Supreme Court would decide.No need to do much more than go on record as to which way the panel thinks is right. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm
Plus he's got a long rap sheet.When you read even more about his alleged crimes, my basic response was: Yeah, that's a bad guy. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:31 pm
And if we already know that someone's been criminally tricked into signing a document, more than likely, it seems like you're entitled to get out of the thing.Without having to go through a year or two of expensive litigation. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:48 pm
Especially in a criminal threats case.But the next sentences are even more surprising:"Prior to opening statements, the trial court removed Ramos from the courtroom for disruptive conduct. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 2:21 pm
In the normal circumstance, you'd generally think that such sentences would meet somewhere in the middle; either a longer sentence for the one molestation or a shorter sentence for two molestations.I get that you want to punish repeated molesters more. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:42 pm
Yuk.Read the opinion for more disgusting details. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:13 pm
Here, the Court of Appeal says "normal" flight plus "high crime area" plus "during the day" doesn't give you the right to search.At a more abstract level, it seems like the police just wanted to swoop down on this one alleyway -- where gang members gathered -- and search everyone there. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:21 pm
But the Court of Appeal today makes state law money laundering cases even easier to prosecute than similar federal law cases, holding that Ninth Circuit precedent that requires "tracing" doesn't apply in California (and thereby disagreeing with a prior Court of Appeal opinion to the contrary).More bad news if you paid a lot of money to get your kid admitted to a college by pretending that s/he was an athlete. [read post]
