Search for: "People v. New" Results 461 - 480 of 41,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm by Donna Eng
Some people who have been reading this blog know that I have been waiting for the decision in Evans v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
 But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
The Duluth News Tribune has devoted the entire front page of today's Metro Section to the new proceedings in Capitol v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:46 am
  As few people make such actionable threats when they're, say, right in front of a cop. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:54 am
Dozens of people lost their lives because of the storm in New Jersey, with even more fatalities in New York. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:07 pm
 Your friend ultimately leaves with her new companion, who drives her home. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 11:27 am
  And the only fight is about whether the evidence was sufficient to justify a retrial at the penalty phase.Plus the opinions total less than 30 pages.It's a brave new world.This is admittedly a somewhat unique case. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
” Ohio Constitution Article I Section 2 provides that ‘[a]ll political power is inherent in the people. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:28 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11) [2009] NSWSC 287  the New South Wales Supreme Court has decided in favour of ASIC's civil claim that a number of statements in the Draft ASX Announcement by James Hardie to the effect that the Foundation would have sufficient funds to meet all legitimate Asbestos Claims, that it was fully funded and provided certainty for people with legitimate Asbestos Claims were false or misleading… [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This is a proceeding wherein the court is faced with the issue of whether or not its discretion as authorized in People v Kalin to deem a misdemeanor complaint charging a drug-related offense to be an information in the absence of a field test or laboratory analysis violate the defendant's constitutional right to due process. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 12:16 pm
 Which means no new opinions.But as we head into the holiday, let's just send a simple message. [read post]
The post Supreme Court adds 7 cases to docket to kick off new term appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]