Search for: "People v. Nixon"
Results 461 - 480
of 625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
Anderson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
opan style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
But, of course, Richard Nixon named four justices in his truncated years in office and Donald Trump three. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 11:13 am
NFIB v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:55 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:18 pm
This trend started in 1973 with Nixon’s War on Drugs, which led to mandatory minimums and an astonishing seven-fold increase in incarcerations. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:35 am
Here’s the key, striking passage from page 7 of the government's petition in Trump v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
Ohio; Cox v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
Burns, 427 U.S. 347(1976) and Branti v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
Pereira v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 4:40 pm
" Nixon v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:45 am
” Sussman v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
Consider the case of Nixon v Ross Coates Solicitors that was heard by the EAT earlier this year (and thus predating the Equality Act). [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
In order for the initiative to revise the constitution, supermajorities of the legislature must propose it to the people for enactment. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
