Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 461 - 480
of 25,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
. * Cunningham v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
In Presser v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm
Part of me wonders whether we're really accomplishing much by spending $5000 on an appointed lawyer and a similar sum on the government side to fight over an $180 fee.Which gets affirmed anyway. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 11:06 am
Is there any part of this guy's sentence, given the facts, that disturbs anyone? [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 11:46 pm
The Ninth Circuit had held the same thing here and here, and it's not at all surprising that the California Court of Appeal goes the same way.Still, I gotta say, Part I of the opinion (which was the relevant portion) was way too flip for me. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:17 am
But -- perhaps in part for that reason -- the state of the law here is profoundly muddled. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:45 pm
But you should read it even before I do.This is the "kangaroo court" case, which I previously discussed here and here, in which Judge Saiers seemed to call the California Court of Appeal a kangaroo court, and to which Justice Sims responded with a hearty bench slap.But now the opinion gets amended to -- largely -- take out the slams on Judge Saiers, in large part because the Court of Appeal accepts the word of the San Joaquin District Attorney, who writes a pretty persuasive… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
" part. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm
The post Today’s orders (part 1) appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:34 pm
And, to tell you the truth, I'm not sure that I've ever really seen one of those before -- one in which that residual doubt might actually have affected my own calculus.Now, admittedly, there's part of me that doesn't especially care, since I'm confident that Hovarter in fact tried to kill another woman, so part of me says that he's only getting what's coming to him anyway. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm
Chief Justice Robert’s opinion in Halo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 9:03 am
1900: Tribune v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
Covid-19 business interruption insurance claims and closure orders by Civil Authorities (USA) Part 4
8 Dec 2021, 10:45 pm
(The Inns By The Sea v California Mutual Insurance Company (Super. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:04 am
” Amaro v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:58 am
Should social impact be a part of constitutional jurisprudence? [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm
In People ex rel. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:00 am
Yet he has not been charged criminally in the case (although 26 other people have, with 21 pleading guilty). [read post]
