Search for: "People v. Render" Results 461 - 480 of 4,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2010, 3:27 am by Timothy R. Hughes
The Supreme Court of Virginia issued an opinion last Friday in the case of Virginia Home for Boys and Girls v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm by David Super
  The most organized of them seeks to overturn Buckley v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:02 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Last week's post discussed People v Jones (2015 NY Slip Op 09773), in which the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed a conviction in the interest of justice due to numerous acts of prosecutorial misconduct in summation which were egregious, but largely unpreserved by timely objection. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:02 pm by New York Criminal Defense
Last week's post discussed People v Jones (2015 NY Slip Op 09773), in which the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed a conviction in the interest of justice due to numerous acts of prosecutorial misconduct in summation which were egregious, but largely unpreserved by timely objection. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Tito & Tita allegedly modified content, rendering it false or misleading, then used that content to kick start its competing business. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am by James Eckert
A verdict is repugnant if an acquittal on one charge conclusively negates a necessary element of a crime for which the defendant was convicted (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1 [1981]). [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am by Eric Goldman
The fact that it’s even close here reflects the perniciousness of the hiQ v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm by randal shaheen
Just because a ZIP code is shared by many individuals does not render it “dissimilar” to a street address, which also is often shared by multiple people. [read post]