Search for: "People v. Roberts"
Results 461 - 480
of 7,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2023, 6:10 am
See Marrone v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:31 pm
—Robert A. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
(The defense team included lawyers from Jaburg & Wilk, Wilenchik & Bartness, and the Law Office of Robert W Shely). [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:30 am
This article begins, in Part One, with a consideration of the Roberts Court’s recent jurisprudence, focusing on three landmark opinions issued in June of 2022: Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Kennedy v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]
19 May 2023, 10:21 am
See ROBERT P. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
But few people ever attempt to convert such decisions into a common currency. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:10 am
People will not perceive its luminosity – its splendor – unless people speak it. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010), Chief Justice John Roberts observed that “[t]he people do not vote for the ‘Officers of the United States. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am
Sadly, data privacy often is a luxury that lower-income people cannot afford. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:32 am
The order came in one of the first gun rights cases to reach the justices in the wake of last year’s decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:30 am
Phelps in 2011, United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
White v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Attending Capita’s AGM, the campaigners called on the company’s Managing Director for Electronic Monitoring to watch and respond to recorded testimonies of people fitted by the surveillance devices. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm
Bruen and Dobbs v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm
Bruen and Dobbs v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:44 pm
Seems entirely right.I was nonetheless struck by the penny ante nature of the alleged workplace misconduct here.Todd Roberts' employer lets people take unpaid time off, but says they need to make every effort to clear such absences in advance. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:59 am
Hirschfeld v. [read post]
