Search for: "People v. Sharp"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Laws by their very nature divide people into different categories and subject them to differing treatment, but not all laws violate the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
Last week in the Courts On 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) heard the important “serious harm” appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Sharp J refused to stay a libel claim as a Jameel abuse. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 7:52 am
262 people were killed with shotguns. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Americans overwhelmingly want sharp reductions of unregulated money in election campaigns, with federal enforcement of rules and disclosure of all donors to campaigns. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
” I was pleased to see the Justices asking some sharp questions about the interpretation of that term for regulatory purposes. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In the Courts On Friday 13 January 2012 the Administrative Court (Toulson LJ, Sweeney and Sharp JJ) heard a remarkable application in the case of R (on the application of Associated Newspapers) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
There is a presumption that judges serve with honesty and integrity. ( People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Hamilton, 59 F.3d 1058, 1073 (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute); People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:28 am
E.g., Newton v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
The Conservatives have said that they want to give people the power to demand that social media sites delete material that was posted when the user was under eighteen. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
The new FCC chairman has announced plans to stop a privacy rule that would limit what internet service providers can do with people’s private data. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am
Newspaper Journalism and regulation GB News has been fined £100,000 by Ofcom for breaching the regulator’s due impartiality rules in relation to its program, People’s Forum: The Prime Minister, in which the then Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, was allowed to promote his government’s policies and performance “mostly uncontested. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of… [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
The case of Harris v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:30 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:43 am
George v. [read post]
