Search for: "People v. Wills" Results 461 - 480 of 5,649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Haier decision, they seek to import a murky soup of considerations into the question of whether the implementer was willing to take a license. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Every one of those politicians in robes found himself or herself on the precipice of achieving what was almost surely their most sought-after lifetime goal: slaying the Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:45 pm
Several people have sent me this link and it is also covered at SexOffenderResearch. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:47 am by Philip J. Berenz
In a 6-0 decision, late last week March 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in the case of Thomas Vincent v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
A couple had wills drawn up that contained identical terms, but each had mistakenly signed the other’s will. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
A couple had wills drawn up that contained identical terms, but each had mistakenly signed the other’s will. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:02 am by INFORRM
  Once again, we would like to thank all our readers and the many people who have contributed to the success of the blog over this period and particularly the large number of people who have written for us since 2010. [read post]