Search for: "Phillips v. Lively" Results 461 - 480 of 539
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 8:33 pm
 V-W does a fantastic job of evoking the feeling of English Renaissance music with his big composition, but it is exciting to hear the original in its proper context and to marvel at the magnificent structure that V-W built up out of this simple hymn tune. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:52 pm
The Supreme Court's 2003 ruling in Wiggins v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:42 pm by Bill Ward
The New York State Court Appeals heard oral arguments today in Goldstein v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
  One such reason is that families want to live and raise their children in an environment that fits their needs and desires. [2]  Another reason is that people feel a sense of security and stability in a gated community. [3]  However, these communities have not escaped strong criticism for their burdensome restrictions, excessive regulation and aggressive enforcement. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Issue: Does the Due Process Clause or Full Faith and Credit Clause, as interpreted in Phillips Petroleum Co v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 10:41 am
Olson Related posts Time to Update the Resume (April 29, 2009) Reflections on my First Live Oral Arguments – Ricci v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:55 am
Keyes, special counsel at the firm, write: In Continental Casualty Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]