Search for: "Potter v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
Concluding the court wasn't ready to overturn Gregg v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
May 15, 2009)(per curiam) (condemnation, uncompensable losses, lost revenue testimony should not have been admitted)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
"This is consistent with how Oracle to the Federal Circuit years ago, with its Harry Potter analogy, which was just genius. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm by Richard Hunt
” Plaintiffs state that they live near their respective Defendants’ stores and have been customers “on prior occasions. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm by Tobias Thienel
(Wilkinson v Kitzinger [2007] EWHC 2022 (Fam), [2007] UKHRR 164, para 107, per Sir Mark Potter P) I'm not sure this reasoning hol [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
    Court finds change to essential terms of employment In asking whether the employee was subject to constructive dismissal, the Court referred to guidance provided by the Supreme Court of Canada in the 2015 decision of Potter v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
    Court finds change to essential terms of employment In asking whether the employee was subject to constructive dismissal, the Court referred to guidance provided by the Supreme Court of Canada in the 2015 decision of Potter v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]