Search for: "Power v. Internal Revenue Service" Results 461 - 480 of 827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2015, 10:02 pm
Although the dire predictions were credited by the court of appeals below as a reason for accepting the interpretation of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), King, supra, 759 F.3d at 374-75, they ignore evidence of related experience and do not account for potential actions by the states that have not set up exchanges, by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), or by Congress. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:16 am
Burwell calls into question the validity of an Internal Revenue Service regulation that provides for subsidies for income-qualified persons who purchase medical insurance on federally-run exchanges. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:47 am by Stephen Wermiel
The case now before the Court turns on what Congress meant when it authorized the Internal Revenue Service to grant tax credits to help pay for health insurance for lower-income individuals who cannot afford to pay for their health benefits. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
For more on this issue, see the report by Transparency International’s Argentine branch, Poder Ciudadano (citizen power). [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
At the same time, the total annual revenue of Chinese lawyers was reportedly 47 billion [read post]
Aside from the owner’s power to terminate the operator under agency principles, the courts have also determined that the HMA is a “personal services agreement” and therefore can be terminated. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/UetyhYZcTr -> Perfect 10 Loses Copyright Suit Against USENET Service Provider–Perfect 10 v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:51 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm by S2KM Limited
Discounted PV and Applicable Federal Rate The NCOIL State Structured Settlement Protection Model Act, which NSSTA and NASP have agreed to support, contains a definition for "discounted present value" linked to "the most recently published Applicable Federal Rate for determining the present value of an annuity, as issued by the United States Internal Revenue Service. [read post]