Search for: "Price v. Cross" Results 461 - 480 of 1,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 9:25 am
“We are committed to preserving competition in the health-insurance industry because competition spurs insurers to lower prices, enhance services and increase quality. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appellant employer asked the respondent Trustees to substitute the Consumer Price Index in the pension scheme, replacing the previously used Retail Prices Index as this would reduce the deficit in the pension scheme, though would also significantly reduce future increases in pensions payable to pensioners. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
” [28]  This bill was never signed into law. [29]   The second bill called for homeowners associations to reimburse a property owner if their home was sold for less than the most recent appraisal of the property. [30] The homeowners association would have to reimburse the owner the difference between the sale price and the appraisal value. [31]  This bill was also not passed into law. [32]  The third bill which has been passed… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:01 am by randywallace
Schneider claims to apply a health economics methodology to determine a weighted average of healthcare prices actually transacted in the market. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:18 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford That’s the question, sort of, raised in Totes-Isotoner v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:18 am by Miriam Seifter
Yesterday, the Supreme Court announced its decision — but no opinion — in Washington v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the law firm's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
If there's anything worse than failing to specify standards for the alternative valuation, it's providing no alternative, as when the buy-sell mandates use of the stale fixed price, which brings us to this week's featured case, DeMatteo v. [read post]