Search for: "Price v. The State of Texas" Results 461 - 480 of 1,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:57 pm by Eric Goldman
At the time, I predicted that other state bars would fall in line behind the opinion, so eventually the Texas rule would prevail across the nation. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
  Finally, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:34 am by Steve Hall
" Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black wrote those words in the Gideon v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
In light of states’ differing responses to the Wayfair v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:45 am by John Jascob
And if the banks had net long positions in Texas Industries, it would make even less sense to believe they would recommend an unwise merger, because the market would react and the stock price would fall. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am by Jack Goldsmith
‌3d 540 (6th Cir. 2021) (upholding Kentucky's price-gouging law as applied to sales on Amazon.com); SPGGC, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by Kevin Russell
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:26 pm by Myers Freelance
Prominent Texas Lawyer Sues Referral Service for Competitive Keyword Ads In every state, there’s a personal injury lawyer who fills the airwaves with advertising and a nickname for their firm. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Elliot Setzer
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982), while the state argued that Rumsfeld v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 2:55 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday morning the Court heard oral arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 11:06 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Right now, she pointed out, the "state gets money from the program but the counties, the courts, and the people are paying the price." [read post]