Search for: "Query v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 2:49 pm by Mark Jaycox and rainey Reitman
"  The bill includes a new emergency clause for the Attorney General, allowing for surveillance of a targeted suspect who enters the United States for 72 hours or until a new surveillance order is obtained. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
One of those dots is Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1809 opinion in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
In case you're wondering why this topic has been chosen, it has been quite controversial in the United States and, in a recent judgment in Och-Ziff, Mr Justice Arnold considered that it was actually part of both EU and United Kingdom trade mark law. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
In support of his position that there was tolling of the statute of limitation under the Montreal Convention by reason of a bankruptcy stay, the plaintiff's submission leads off with a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Varghese v China South Airlines Ltd, 925 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2019). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am by Wessen Jazrawi
The Government of the United States of America v  Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:43 pm by WSLL
State, 2009 WY 17, ¶ 3, 201 P.3d 434, 436 (Wyo. 2009); Harlow v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:20 am
  The attorney was charged with obstruction and making false statements related to a Food and Drug Administration investigation into drug promotions (United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
If the Biden administration is going to revisit the regulations, query whether the court will want to address them now. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:49 pm
Paul (1969) held that this term includes “recreational areas” and not just places for spectators to watch events (as in the theaters, concert halls, and stadiums that are listed in the same subsection); United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am by Helen Klein
To retroactivity and fair notice broadly, the brief argues, “no accused could have had notice that the laws of war applied in Yemen in 2000”—and in fact, “the President and Congress’s pronouncements that the United States was not at war in Yemen provided notice that the laws of w [read post]