Search for: "ROBINSON v. STATE" Results 461 - 480 of 2,230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that after Wednesday’s oral argument in Kisor v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:19 pm by Mack Sperling
So why did Business Court Judge Robinson dismiss the UDTPA claim in the antitrust lawsuit (at the Rule 12 stage) in DiCesare v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court takes up Flowers v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court considered the principle established in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Onibiyo [1996] QB 768, that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am by Rob Robinson
Logistic Regression: A state-of-the-art supervised learning algorithm for machine learning that estimates the probability that a document is relevant, based on the features that it contai [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson report that in separate concurrences, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch supported “incorporating the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause to the states by way of the privileges or immunities clause instead of via the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause,” “a view of the Constitution that could be incredibly consequential were it to eventually find favor with a majority of justices. [read post]