Search for: "Read v. Social Security Administration"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 7:48 pm
In 2002, also during the marriage, the Social Security Administration determined that the Defendant was disabled by multiple sclerosis. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:16 pm
See Marchand v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
(This op-ed was first published in Just Security on April 13, 2020.) [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 10:53 am
The only people allowed to be outside their cars were the pastor, the videographer, and security personnel, and the pastor and videographer said they would "remain a very safe distance from your cars. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
I don't read Jacobson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 5:40 pm
In a new decision in Simcoe Muskoka Child and Youth Family Services v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
It is reported that one of the first federal employees to test positive for COVID-19 works at the Grand Prairie, Texas administrative facility. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:28 am
Viral crisis — after/during Covid-19 emergency Then came Coronavirus, and the Government’s recommendations for increased social distancing, and, as of last week, the closure of many public venues and schools. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
A Private Duty in Pandemics, and Insurance Considerations In Adam, Abudu v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:21 pm
GermanyBILD v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
McIntosh said this is not a move to take lightly because Social Security is considering replacing independent ALJs with AAJs who are Social Security employees and who are subject to performance reviews by the agency. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Defending the MPP, the Department of Homeland Security argued for a narrower reading of the expedited removal provisions in the INA. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:07 am
" Jian Zhang v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm
The Dutch NCP, of course, never reached the issue of legal risk that might attach to the international obligations it read into VEON's duties under the OECD Guidelines. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 10:58 am
See Stewart v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Wednesday, February 5, 2020, 10:00 a.m.: The House Homeland Security Subcommittee for Transportation and Maritime Security will hold a hearing on homeland security priorities in the Arctic. [read post]
